Vanuatu
| 1.1 | Welcome and Introductions/role of IOC,ICG-PTWS, and SMART |
| 1.10 | TAMTAM catalyzing student involvement and education |
| 1.11 | Summary of day 1, Discussion, revise agenda if required |
| 1.2 | Overview of meeting aims/objectives/IOC requirements and expectations of experts meeting |
| 1.3 | Introductions |
| 1.4 | Regional tectonic overview |
| 1.5.1 | Introduce the SATREPS project |
| 1.5.2 | JICA's Van-REDI project |
| 1.5.3 | Vanuatu trench historical earthquakes and catalogues |
| 1.6 | Tunsami modelling and the 2021 and 2023 Loyalty Islands earthquakes and tsunamis |
| 1.7 | Introduction of French initiatives on the Tamtam SMART cable project |
| 1.8 | Synergies between the project Geophysical Study of Ongoing Subduction Initiation Along the Matthew-Hunter Trench and Tamtam SMART |
| 1.9 | Vanuatu perspective on experts workshop and Tamtam SMART Cable in the region |
| 2.1 | Introdution of Day 2 |
| 2.2.1 | Global practice and global analogues |
| 2.2.2 | Overview of trench systems |
| 2.2 | Current state overviews |
| 2.3.1 | Volcano sources |
| 2.3.1 | Tsunami Modelling/Tsunami Science |
| 2.3.2 | Deterministic seismic assessment options |
| 2.3.3 | Seismology |
| 2.3.4 | Paleotsunami |
| 2.3.5 | GNSS/Geodesy |
| 2.3 | Current state scientific updates continued |
| 2.4 | Analysis Options: Probailistic seismic assessment options |
| 2.4 | Analysis Options: Deterministic vs. probabilistic approaches - discussion |
| 2.5 | Constraints: Discussion |
| 2.5 | Discussion on elicitation process on seismic source models to support tsunami discussions (Potential models that can be tested) |
| 2.6 | Discussion on elicitation process on seismic source models to support tsunami discussions (potential models that can be tested) |
| 3.1 | Re-confirm and test meeting outcomes and following Day 2 (What can/we need to acheive and priorities) |
| 3.2.1 | Agree on scenarios for each trench system (incluidng credibiltiy ranking) Part 1 |
| 3.2.2 | Agree on scenarios for each trench system (incluidng credibility ranking) Part 2 |
| 3.2.3 | Agree on scenarios for each trench system (incluidng credibility ranking) Part 3 |
| 3.3 | Implications for tsunanim hazards and warning - do our findings change accepted state? |
| 3.4 | How can we test the impact of the scenarios? |
| 4.1 | Re-confirm and test meeting outcomes and follwing Day 2 (what can/we need to achieve and priorities) |
| 4.10 | Data Management TAMTAM Cable |
| 4.11 | Closing |
| 4.2 | Review of scenarios (Hopefully follwing some modeling) |
| 4.3 | Anything we have missed? Recommended further work |
| 4.4 | Summary |
| 4.6 | Review the TAMTAM Project |
| 4.6 | Discussion - Question and answer with Ministers and Delegates |
| 4.7 | Review of expert meeting result in relation to the TAMTAM Cable |
| 4.8 | Prima and TAMTAM Cable |
| 4.9 | Pacific Peering and TAMTAM Cable |